Demographics details for Woodbury, TN vs Bogue chitto, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodbury, TN vs Bogue chitto, MS.
Data | Woodbury | Bogue chitto |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,804 | 319 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 19.7 years |
Median Income | $51,528 | $16,778 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 28% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodbury vs Bogue chitto
- In Woodbury, the population is higher at 2,804, compared to 319 in Bogue chitto.
- Residents in Woodbury have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 19.7 years in Bogue chitto.
- Woodbury has a higher median income of $51,528 compared to $16,778 in Bogue chitto.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodbury at 25.0% compared to 22.0% in Bogue chitto.
- The poverty level is higher in Bogue chitto at 28%, compared to 10% in Woodbury.
- Bogue chitto has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Woodbury vs Bogue chitto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodbury | Bogue chitto |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 50 |
White | 89 | 30 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 93 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodbury vs Bogue chitto
- In Bogue chitto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- Woodbury has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 30% in Bogue chitto.
- In Bogue chitto, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Woodbury.
- Bogue chitto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 4% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bogue chitto at 7%, compared to 3% in Woodbury.
- In Bogue chitto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 93%, compared to 0% in Woodbury.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodbury | Bogue chitto |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 15.6% |
Depression | 30.2% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 23.4% | 28.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 43.6% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbury vs Bogue chitto
- More residents in Woodbury report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 19.7% in Bogue chitto.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodbury at 30.2% compared to 23.6% in Bogue chitto.
- Bogue chitto has a higher smoking rate at 28.0% compared to 23.4% in Woodbury.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodbury at 15.6% compared to 15.2% in Bogue chitto.
- Bogue chitto has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 35.6% in Woodbury.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodbury at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Bogue chitto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodbury | Bogue chitto |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (21) | 1.6% (5) |
High School Diploma | 28.8% (807) | 5.0% (16) |
Less than High School | 17.9% (502) | 2.5% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (271) | 8.8% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodbury vs Bogue chitto
- In Bogue chitto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a high school diploma at 28.8% compared to 5.0% in Bogue chitto.
- More residents in Woodbury have less than a high school education at 17.9% compared to 2.5% in Bogue chitto.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodbury hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 8.8% in Bogue chitto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.