Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Washington, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Washington, ME.
| Data | Woodburn | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 31,437 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $51,669 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 31,437, compared to 27,290 in Woodburn.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916 compared to $51,669 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate in Woodburn is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 22 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 59 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 87% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 3% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 4% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 1% in Woodburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.9% in Woodburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.9% versus 27.1% in Woodburn.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 17.8% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 37.0% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Woodburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 0.5% (169) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 22.0% (6,922) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 12.7% (4,002) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 18.0% (5,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.5% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 12.7% in Washington.
- In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.