Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Susanville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Susanville, CA.
| Data | Woodburn | Susanville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 13,707 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $52,997 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Susanville
- In Woodburn, the population is higher at 27,290, compared to 13,707 in Susanville.
- Residents in Woodburn have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 33.7 years in Susanville.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916 compared to $52,997 in Susanville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodburn at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Susanville.
- The poverty level is higher in Susanville at 13%, compared to 12% in Woodburn.
- Susanville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Susanville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Susanville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 16 |
| White | 22 | 29 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 59 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Susanville
- In Susanville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Susanville at 29% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- In Susanville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Woodburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 33% in Susanville.
- Both Woodburn and Susanville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 17%.
- In Susanville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Woodburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Susanville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 18.1% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Susanville
- More residents in Woodburn report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.9% in Susanville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 27.1% compared to 18.1% in Susanville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodburn at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Susanville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Susanville at 18.5% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 32.9% in Susanville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodburn at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Susanville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Susanville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 1.2% (170) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 19.1% (2,613) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 39.3% (5,387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 7.0% (962) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Susanville
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.2% in Susanville.
- In Susanville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Susanville at 39.3%, compared to 38.2% in Woodburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 7.0% in Susanville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.