Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Simi valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Simi valley, CA.
| Data | Woodburn | Simi valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 124,398 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $112,144 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Simi valley
- The population in Simi valley is higher at 124,398, compared to 27,290 in Woodburn.
- The median age in Simi valley is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Simi valley has a higher median income of $112,144, compared to $58,916 in Woodburn.
- In Simi valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Simi valley.
- Simi valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Simi valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Simi valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 22 | 47 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 59 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Simi valley
- In Simi valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Simi valley at 47% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- In Simi valley, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Woodburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 27% in Simi valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 12% in Simi valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodburn and Simi valley at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Simi valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Simi valley
- More residents in Woodburn report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.6% in Simi valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 27.1% compared to 18.3% in Simi valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodburn at 18.0% compared to 10.6% in Simi valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Simi valley at 17.6% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 25.1% in Simi valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodburn at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Simi valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Simi valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 0.9% (1,160) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 13.1% (16,296) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 11.5% (14,362) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 25.9% (32,216) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Simi valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.9% in Simi valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 13.1% in Simi valley.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 11.5% in Simi valley.
- In Simi valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.9% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.