Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Jasper, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Jasper, AL.
| Data | Woodburn | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 14,338 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $62,850 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Jasper
- In Woodburn, the population is higher at 27,290, compared to 14,338 in Jasper.
- Residents in Woodburn have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher median income of $62,850, compared to $58,916 in Woodburn.
- In Jasper, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 15%, compared to 12% in Woodburn.
- Jasper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 22 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 59 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jasper at 81% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Jasper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 5% in Jasper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 4% in Jasper.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Jasper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.9% in Woodburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 27.1% compared to 24.0% in Jasper.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jasper at 15.1% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 38.2% in Jasper.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Woodburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 0.5% (69) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 14.6% (2,098) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 12.9% (1,856) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 16.3% (2,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Jasper
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.5% in Jasper.
- In Jasper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 12.9% in Jasper.
- In Jasper, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.