Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Woodburn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 27,290 in Woodburn.
- Residents in Woodburn have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 38.7 years in Greenville.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodburn at 35.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 12% in Woodburn.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 87 |
| White | 22 | 11 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 59 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 22% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- Both Woodburn and Greenville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.9% in Woodburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 27.1% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodburn at 14.4% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 40.5% in Woodburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 14.0% in Woodburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Greenville
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 1.8% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.