Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Fancy farm, KY.
| Data | Woodburn | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 300 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 51.1 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $55,060 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Fancy farm
- In Woodburn, the population is higher at 27,290, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher median income of $58,916 compared to $55,060 in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodburn at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- Woodburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- The unemployment rate in Woodburn is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 22 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 59 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fancy farm at 91% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 6% in Fancy farm.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodburn at 1% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Fancy farm
- More residents in Woodburn report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Fancy farm.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 27.1% in Woodburn.
- Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 18.0% in Woodburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 37.4% in Fancy farm.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Woodburn and Fancy farm at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 47.7% (143) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 5.3% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.