Demographics details for Woodburn, OR vs Addison, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodburn, OR vs Addison, IL.
| Data | Woodburn | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,290 | 35,127 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $58,916 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Woodburn vs Addison
- The population in Addison is higher at 35,127, compared to 27,290 in Woodburn.
- The median age in Addison is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 39.2 years in Woodburn.
- Addison has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $58,916 in Woodburn.
- In Addison, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodburn.
- Woodburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.8% in Woodburn.
Demographics
Demographics Woodburn vs Addison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodburn | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 22 | 32 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 59 | 42 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Woodburn vs Addison
- In Addison, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Woodburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Addison at 32% compared to 22% in Woodburn.
- In Addison, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Woodburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodburn at 59% compared to 42% in Addison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodburn at 17% compared to 12% in Addison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodburn and Addison at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodburn | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodburn vs Addison
- More residents in Woodburn report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Addison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodburn at 27.1% compared to 17.7% in Addison.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodburn at 18.0% compared to 14.9% in Addison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Addison at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in Woodburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Woodburn at 40.5% compared to 35.0% in Addison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodburn at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Addison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodburn | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.6% (992) | 2.1% (744) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (3,628) | 19.0% (6,671) |
| Less than High School | 38.2% (10,414) | 27.2% (9,554) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (2,578) | 17.1% (6,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodburn vs Addison
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodburn have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 2.1% in Addison.
- In Addison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 13.3% in Woodburn.
- More residents in Woodburn have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 27.2% in Addison.
- In Addison, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 9.4% in Woodburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.