Demographics details for Woodbridge, VA vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Woodbridge, VA vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Woodbridge Massapequa park
Population 42,619 16,873
Median Age 34.2 years 43.7 years
Median Income $93,347 $161,193
Married Families 35.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Woodbridge vs Massapequa park

  • In Woodbridge, the population is higher at 42,619, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 34.2 years in Woodbridge.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $93,347 in Woodbridge.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 35.0% in Woodbridge.
  • Woodbridge has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Woodbridge.

Demographics

Demographics Woodbridge vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Woodbridge Massapequa park
Black 26 1
White 10 88
Asian 9 2
Hispanic 41 5
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Woodbridge vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Woodbridge at 26% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 10% in Woodbridge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Woodbridge at 9% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Woodbridge at 41% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Woodbridge at 13% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Woodbridge at 1% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Woodbridge Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 13.3% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 8.0%
Depression 17.4% 17.9%
Smoking 10.7% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 19.2%
Obesity 34.0% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Woodbridge vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 13.3% in Woodbridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Massapequa park at 17.9% versus 17.4% in Woodbridge.
  • Massapequa park has a higher smoking rate at 11.5% compared to 10.7% in Woodbridge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Woodbridge.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Woodbridge at 34.0% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Woodbridge and Massapequa park at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Woodbridge Massapequa park
No Schooling 3.4% (1,450) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 15.8% (6,727) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 17.5% (7,473) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.2% (8,628) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Woodbridge vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodbridge have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Woodbridge hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in Woodbridge have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 20.2% in Woodbridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.