Demographics details for Wiota, IA vs Arapaho, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wiota, IA vs Arapaho, OK.
| Data | Wiota | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91 | 654 |
| Median Age | 70.0 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $73,403 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 71.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wiota vs Arapaho
- The population in Arapaho is higher at 654, compared to 91 in Wiota.
- Residents in Wiota have a higher median age of 70.0 years compared to 38.1 years in Arapaho.
- Wiota has a higher median income of $73,403 compared to $37,361 in Arapaho.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wiota at 71.0% compared to 51.0% in Arapaho.
- The poverty level is higher in Arapaho at 14%, compared to 0% in Wiota.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Wiota and Arapaho at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Wiota vs Arapaho provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wiota | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 100 | 64 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 21 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 7 |
Demographics Comparison: Wiota vs Arapaho
- In Arapaho, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Wiota.
- Wiota has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 64% in Arapaho.
- Both Wiota and Arapaho have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Arapaho has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 0% in Wiota.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arapaho at 6%, compared to 0% in Wiota.
- In Arapaho, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 7%, compared to 0% in Wiota.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wiota | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 18.7% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wiota vs Arapaho
- In Arapaho, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.3% in Wiota.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arapaho at 24.5% versus 18.3% in Wiota.
- Arapaho has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 18.7% in Wiota.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wiota at 22.8% compared to 14.8% in Arapaho.
- Arapaho has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 41.9% in Wiota.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wiota at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Arapaho.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wiota | Arapaho |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 35.2% (32) | 41.6% (272) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (4) | 16.2% (106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (9) | 4.1% (27) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wiota vs Arapaho
- A higher percentage of residents in Wiota have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Arapaho.
- In Arapaho, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.6% compared to 35.2% in Wiota.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arapaho at 16.2%, compared to 4.4% in Wiota.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wiota hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 4.1% in Arapaho.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.