Demographics details for Winters, TX vs Sterling heights, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winters, TX vs Sterling heights, MI.
Data | Winters | Sterling heights |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,330 | 132,567 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 41.2 years |
Median Income | $44,426 | $75,381 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Winters vs Sterling heights
- The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 2,330 in Winters.
- The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 33.9 years in Winters.
- Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $44,426 in Winters.
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Winters.
- Winters has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
- The unemployment rate in Winters is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.
Demographics
Demographics Winters vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Winters | Sterling heights |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 36 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | 48 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Winters vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Winters.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 36% in Winters.
- In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Winters.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Winters at 48% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Winters at 15% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winters and Sterling heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Winters | Sterling heights |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 11.4% |
Depression | 25.7% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winters vs Sterling heights
- More residents in Winters report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
- Depression is more prevalent in Winters at 25.7% compared to 25.5% in Sterling heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Winters at 23.5% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 16.3% in Winters.
- Obesity rates are higher in Winters at 41.7% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Winters at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Winters | Sterling heights |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (35) | 2.4% (3,134) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (484) | 18.8% (24,937) |
Less than High School | 35.9% (836) | 16.6% (22,008) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (158) | 22.3% (29,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winters vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.5% in Winters.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winters hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents in Winters have less than a high school education at 35.9% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
- In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 6.8% in Winters.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.