Demographics details for Winters, TX vs Lake leelanau, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winters, TX vs Lake leelanau, MI.
Data | Winters | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,330 | 165 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 27.9 years |
Median Income | $44,426 | $48,125 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Winters vs Lake leelanau
- In Winters, the population is higher at 2,330, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
- Residents in Winters have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
- Lake leelanau has a higher median income of $48,125, compared to $44,426 in Winters.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Winters at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
- Winters has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
- The unemployment rate in Winters is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Lake leelanau.
Demographics
Demographics Winters vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Winters | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 36 | 100 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 48 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Winters vs Lake leelanau
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Winters at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 36% in Winters.
- Both Winters and Lake leelanau have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Winters at 48% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Winters at 15% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winters and Lake leelanau at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Winters | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 8.4% |
Depression | 25.7% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 31.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winters vs Lake leelanau
- More residents in Winters report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
- Depression is more prevalent in Winters at 25.7% compared to 22.5% in Lake leelanau.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Winters at 23.5% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Winters.
- Obesity rates are higher in Winters at 41.7% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Winters.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Winters | Lake leelanau |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (35) | 2.4% (4) |
High School Diploma | 20.8% (484) | 13.3% (22) |
Less than High School | 35.9% (836) | 4.8% (8) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (158) | 13.9% (23) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winters vs Lake leelanau
- In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.5% in Winters.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winters hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
- More residents in Winters have less than a high school education at 35.9% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
- In Lake leelanau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 6.8% in Winters.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.