Demographics details for Winters, TX vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Winters, TX vs Junction city, KS.

Data Winters Junction city
Population 2,330 22,264
Median Age 33.9 years 28.5 years
Median Income $44,426 $60,709
Married Families 36.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 13% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.8

Population Comparison: Winters vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 2,330 in Winters.
  • Residents in Winters have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $44,426 in Winters.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Winters.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Winters and Junction city at 13%.
  • The unemployment rate in Winters is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.8% in Junction city.

Demographics

Demographics Winters vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Winters Junction city
Black 1 20
White 36 43
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 48 18
Two or More Races 15 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Winters vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Winters.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Junction city at 43% compared to 36% in Winters.
  • In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Winters.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Winters at 48% compared to 18% in Junction city.
  • Both Winters and Junction city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 15%.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Winters.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Winters Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 20.5% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 11.0%
Depression 25.7% 19.2%
Smoking 23.5% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 16.6%
Obesity 41.7% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Winters vs Junction city

  • More residents in Winters report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Winters at 25.7% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Winters at 23.5% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Winters.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 41.7% in Winters.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Winters and Junction city at 16.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Winters Junction city
No Schooling 1.5% (35) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 20.8% (484) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 35.9% (836) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.8% (158) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Winters vs Junction city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Winters have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Winters hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Winters have less than a high school education at 35.9% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 6.8% in Winters.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.