Demographics details for Winters, TX vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winters, TX vs Central falls, RI.
| Data | Winters | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,330 | 22,490 |
| Median Age | 33.9 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $44,426 | $43,092 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Winters vs Central falls
- The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 2,330 in Winters.
- Residents in Winters have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Winters has a higher median income of $44,426 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Winters at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 13% in Winters.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.0% in Winters.
Demographics
Demographics Winters vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Winters | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 36 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 48 | 69 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Winters vs Central falls
- In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Winters.
- Winters has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- Both Winters and Central falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 48% in Winters.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 15% in Winters.
- In Central falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Winters.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Winters | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 41.7% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winters vs Central falls
- More residents in Winters report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.8% in Central falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 25.7% in Winters.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Winters at 23.5% compared to 22.8% in Central falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Winters at 16.3% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Winters at 41.7% compared to 40.6% in Central falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Winters at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Winters | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (35) | 4.7% (1,048) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (484) | 15.1% (3,406) |
| Less than High School | 35.9% (836) | 44.1% (9,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (158) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winters vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 1.5% in Winters.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winters hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 35.9% in Winters.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winters hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.8% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.