Demographics details for Winona, MS vs Ephraim, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Winona, MS vs Ephraim, WI.

Data Winona Ephraim
Population 4,159 346
Median Age 33.7 years 63.9 years
Median Income $26,250 $72,292
Married Families 21.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 24% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Winona vs Ephraim

  • In Winona, the population is higher at 4,159, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
  • The median age in Ephraim is higher at 63.9 years, compared to 33.7 years in Winona.
  • Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292, compared to $26,250 in Winona.
  • In Ephraim, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 21.0% in Winona.
  • Winona has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
  • The unemployment rate in Winona is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Ephraim.

Demographics

Demographics Winona vs Ephraim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Winona Ephraim
Black 62 Data is updating
White 38 96
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Winona vs Ephraim

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Winona at 62% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephraim at 96% compared to 38% in Winona.
  • Both Winona and Ephraim have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Winona and Ephraim at 0%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephraim at 4%, compared to 0% in Winona.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winona and Ephraim at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Winona Ephraim
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 7.7%
Depression 22.3% 21.1%
Smoking 24.8% 11.2%
Binge Drinking 11.8% 25.7%
Obesity 46.4% 31.7%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Winona vs Ephraim

  • More residents in Winona report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Winona at 22.3% compared to 21.1% in Ephraim.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Winona at 24.8% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 11.8% in Winona.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Winona at 46.4% compared to 31.7% in Ephraim.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Winona at 25.0% compared to 19.0% in Ephraim.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Winona Ephraim
No Schooling 2.1% (87) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.4% (473) 4.3% (15)
Less than High School 28.5% (1,186) 2.3% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (388) 59.5% (206)

Education Levels Comparison: Winona vs Ephraim

  • A higher percentage of residents in Winona have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Winona hold a high school diploma at 11.4% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
  • More residents in Winona have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
  • In Ephraim, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 9.3% in Winona.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.