Demographics details for Winona, MS vs Avenal, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winona, MS vs Avenal, CA.
| Data | Winona | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,159 | 13,374 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 30.4 years |
| Median Income | $26,250 | $51,902 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 26% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 9.5 |
Population Comparison: Winona vs Avenal
- The population in Avenal is higher at 13,374, compared to 4,159 in Winona.
- Residents in Winona have a higher median age of 33.7 years compared to 30.4 years in Avenal.
- Avenal has a higher median income of $51,902, compared to $26,250 in Winona.
- In Avenal, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 21.0% in Winona.
- The poverty level is higher in Avenal at 26%, compared to 24% in Winona.
- Avenal has a higher unemployment rate at 9.5% compared to 3.6% in Winona.
Demographics
Demographics Winona vs Avenal provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Winona | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 4 |
| White | 38 | -6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 85 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Winona vs Avenal
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Winona at 62% compared to 4% in Avenal.
- Winona has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to -6% in Avenal.
- In Avenal, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Winona.
- Avenal has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 85%, compared to 0% in Winona.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Avenal at 15%, compared to 0% in Winona.
- In Avenal, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Winona.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Winona | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 46.4% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winona vs Avenal
- More residents in Winona report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.6% in Avenal.
- Depression is more prevalent in Winona at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Avenal.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Winona at 24.8% compared to 21.7% in Avenal.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Avenal at 15.4% compared to 11.8% in Winona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Winona at 46.4% compared to 40.2% in Avenal.
- Disability percentages are higher in Winona at 25.0% compared to 6.0% in Avenal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Winona | Avenal |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (87) | 2.4% (327) |
| High School Diploma | 11.4% (473) | 10.6% (1,415) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (1,186) | 61.0% (8,153) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (388) | 3.5% (473) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winona vs Avenal
- In Avenal, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.1% in Winona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winona hold a high school diploma at 11.4% compared to 10.6% in Avenal.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Avenal at 61.0%, compared to 28.5% in Winona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 3.5% in Avenal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.