Demographics details for Winfield, KS vs Mccomb, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winfield, KS vs Mccomb, MS.
| Data | Winfield | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,701 | 12,041 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,850 | $37,288 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Winfield vs Mccomb
- The population in Mccomb is higher at 12,041, compared to 11,701 in Winfield.
- Residents in Winfield have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Mccomb.
- Winfield has a higher median income of $55,850 compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Winfield at 34.0% compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccomb at 22%, compared to 11% in Winfield.
- Mccomb has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Winfield.
Demographics
Demographics Winfield vs Mccomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Winfield | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 75 |
| White | 79 | 22 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Winfield vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 75% compared to 3% in Winfield.
- Winfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- The Asian population is larger in Winfield at 4% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Winfield at 8% compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Winfield at 6% compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winfield and Mccomb at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Winfield | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 16.2% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 10.8% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 48.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winfield vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Winfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccomb at 24.3% versus 22.4% in Winfield.
- Mccomb has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 20.5% in Winfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Winfield at 17.4% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has higher obesity rates at 48.5% compared to 40.5% in Winfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Winfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Winfield | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (173) | 0.7% (81) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (1,856) | 22.1% (2,666) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (1,217) | 11.2% (1,349) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,232) | 12.1% (1,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winfield vs Mccomb
- A higher percentage of residents in Winfield have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in Mccomb.
- In Mccomb, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 15.9% in Winfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccomb at 11.2%, compared to 10.4% in Winfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 12.1% in Mccomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.