Demographics details for Winder, GA vs Edinburg, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winder, GA vs Edinburg, TX.
| Data | Winder | Edinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,400 | 104,294 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 29.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,365 | $54,139 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Winder vs Edinburg
- The population in Edinburg is higher at 104,294, compared to 19,400 in Winder.
- Residents in Winder have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 29.9 years in Edinburg.
- Winder has a higher median income of $57,365 compared to $54,139 in Edinburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Winder at 34.0% compared to 30.0% in Edinburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Edinburg at 21%, compared to 13% in Winder.
- Edinburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Winder.
Demographics
Demographics Winder vs Edinburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Winder | Edinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 2 |
| White | 53 | -26 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 38 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Winder vs Edinburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Winder at 20% compared to 2% in Edinburg.
- Winder has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to -26% in Edinburg.
- Both Winder and Edinburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Edinburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 15% in Winder.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edinburg at 38%, compared to 10% in Winder.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winder and Edinburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Winder | Edinburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 40.9% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winder vs Edinburg
- More residents in Winder report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.6% in Edinburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Winder at 22.6% compared to 18.3% in Edinburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Winder at 19.8% compared to 13.9% in Edinburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Edinburg at 17.0% compared to 15.5% in Winder.
- Edinburg has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 40.9% in Winder.
- Disability percentages are higher in Winder at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Edinburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Winder | Edinburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (240) | 1.3% (1,343) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (3,070) | 10.3% (10,758) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (2,718) | 22.5% (23,503) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (2,516) | 16.1% (16,818) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winder vs Edinburg
- In Edinburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Winder.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winder hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 10.3% in Edinburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edinburg at 22.5%, compared to 14.0% in Winder.
- In Edinburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 13.0% in Winder.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.