Demographics details for Windber, PA vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Windber, PA vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Windber | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,875 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,299 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Windber vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 3,875 in Windber.
- Residents in Windber have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $48,299 in Windber.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Windber.
- The poverty level is identical in both Windber and Taylorsville at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Windber is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.6% in Taylorsville.
Demographics
Demographics Windber vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Windber | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 99 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Windber vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Windber.
- Windber has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Windber.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Windber.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 1% in Windber.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Windber.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Windber | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Windber vs Taylorsville
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Windber and Taylorsville at 18.8%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 24.8% in Windber.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Windber at 23.4% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Windber at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Windber at 41.2% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Windber at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Windber | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (24) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 38.3% (1,484) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (268) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (496) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Windber vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Windber.
- A higher percentage of residents in Windber hold a high school diploma at 38.3% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 6.9% in Windber.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 12.8% in Windber.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.