Demographics details for Winchester, TN vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Winchester, TN vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Winchester | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,859 | 681 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,054 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Winchester vs Friendship
- In Winchester, the population is higher at 9,859, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 43.6 years in Winchester.
- Winchester has a higher median income of $58,054 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Winchester at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- The poverty level is identical in both Winchester and Friendship at 12%.
- Friendship has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Winchester.
Demographics
Demographics Winchester vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Winchester | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 5 |
| White | 73 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Winchester vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Winchester at 10% compared to 5% in Friendship.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 73% in Winchester.
- The Asian population is larger in Winchester at 1% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Winchester at 10% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friendship at 9%, compared to 5% in Winchester.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Winchester and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Winchester | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Winchester vs Friendship
- More residents in Winchester report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Depression is more prevalent in Winchester at 27.0% compared to 24.3% in Friendship.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.8% in Winchester.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 15.8% in Winchester.
- Obesity rates are higher in Winchester at 39.9% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- Disability percentages are higher in Winchester at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Friendship.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Winchester | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (110) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,906) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (1,340) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.7% (1,741) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Winchester vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Winchester have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 19.3% in Winchester.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 13.6% in Winchester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Winchester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.