Demographics details for Willowick, OH vs Waterman, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Willowick, OH vs Waterman, IL.
Data | Willowick | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Population | 14,139 | 1,427 |
Median Age | 41.1 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $71,418 | $87,292 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Willowick vs Waterman
- In Willowick, the population is higher at 14,139, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
- Residents in Willowick have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292, compared to $71,418 in Willowick.
- In Waterman, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 39.0% in Willowick.
- Willowick has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Waterman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Willowick and Waterman at 4.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Willowick vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Willowick | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 86 | 78 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Willowick vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Willowick at 8% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- Willowick has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 78% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Willowick.
- Waterman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Willowick.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterman at 9%, compared to 4% in Willowick.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Willowick and Waterman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Willowick | Waterman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.4% |
Depression | 22.7% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Willowick vs Waterman
- More residents in Willowick report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Waterman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Willowick at 22.7% compared to 21.6% in Waterman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Willowick at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Waterman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Willowick at 19.3% compared to 18.7% in Waterman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Willowick at 36.9% compared to 36.4% in Waterman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Willowick at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Waterman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Willowick | Waterman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,975) | 22.6% (323) |
Less than High School | 7.4% (1,048) | 8.5% (122) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (2,548) | 15.5% (221) |
Education Levels Comparison: Willowick vs Waterman
- A higher percentage of residents in Willowick have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
- In Waterman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 21.0% in Willowick.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterman at 8.5%, compared to 7.4% in Willowick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Willowick hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.