Demographics details for Willow street, PA vs Warner robins, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Willow street, PA vs Warner robins, GA.

Data Willow street Warner robins
Population 9,640 82,175
Median Age 52.8 years 32.4 years
Median Income $100,727 $63,678
Married Families 53.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.8

Population Comparison: Willow street vs Warner robins

  • The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 9,640 in Willow street.
  • Residents in Willow street have a higher median age of 52.8 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
  • Willow street has a higher median income of $100,727 compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Willow street at 53.0% compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
  • The poverty level is higher in Warner robins at 8%, compared to 5% in Willow street.
  • Warner robins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.2% in Willow street.

Demographics

Demographics Willow street vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Willow street Warner robins
Black 2 40
White 81 42
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Willow street vs Warner robins

  • In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 2% in Willow street.
  • Willow street has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
  • The Asian population is larger in Willow street at 4% compared to 3% in Warner robins.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Willow street and Warner robins at 7%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Warner robins at 7%, compared to 5% in Willow street.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Willow street and Warner robins at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Willow street Warner robins
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 13.1%
Depression 22.3% 22.1%
Smoking 14.9% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 15.9%
Obesity 32.9% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Willow street vs Warner robins

  • In Warner robins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in Willow street.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Willow street at 22.3% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in Willow street.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Willow street at 18.7% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
  • Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 32.9% in Willow street.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Willow street at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Willow street Warner robins
No Schooling 0.3% (32) 0.4% (335)
High School Diploma 17.8% (1,717) 14.9% (12,260)
Less than High School 7.6% (734) 7.0% (5,714)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.5% (3,517) 19.2% (15,752)

Education Levels Comparison: Willow street vs Warner robins

  • In Warner robins, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Willow street.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Willow street hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
  • More residents in Willow street have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Willow street hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.