Demographics details for Willingboro, NJ vs Silt, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Willingboro, NJ vs Silt, CO.
| Data | Willingboro | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,846 | 3,594 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $88,516 | $72,450 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Willingboro vs Silt
- In Willingboro, the population is higher at 31,846, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- Residents in Willingboro have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Willingboro has a higher median income of $88,516 compared to $72,450 in Silt.
- In Silt, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Willingboro.
- The poverty level is identical in both Willingboro and Silt at 8%.
- Silt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.1% in Willingboro.
Demographics
Demographics Willingboro vs Silt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Willingboro | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 1 |
| White | 4 | 43 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Willingboro vs Silt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Willingboro at 66% compared to 1% in Silt.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Silt at 43% compared to 4% in Willingboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Willingboro at 1% compared to 0% in Silt.
- Silt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 15% in Willingboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Silt at 17%, compared to 13% in Willingboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Willingboro at 1% compared to 0% in Silt.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Willingboro | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 25.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Willingboro vs Silt
- In Silt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Willingboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Silt at 23.2% versus 0.0% in Willingboro.
- Silt has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Willingboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Silt at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Willingboro.
- Silt has higher obesity rates at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Willingboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Willingboro at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Willingboro | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (160) | 2.2% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 20.7% (6,594) | 11.4% (409) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (2,094) | 17.0% (611) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (5,856) | 11.0% (397) |
Education Levels Comparison: Willingboro vs Silt
- In Silt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Willingboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Willingboro hold a high school diploma at 20.7% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Silt at 17.0%, compared to 6.6% in Willingboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Willingboro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.