Demographics details for Williamsport, PA vs Big bear lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Williamsport, PA vs Big bear lake, CA.

Data Williamsport Big bear lake
Population 27,403 5,031
Median Age 30.3 years 47.5 years
Median Income $48,388 $70,020
Married Families 24.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 16% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 5.0

Population Comparison: Williamsport vs Big bear lake

  • In Williamsport, the population is higher at 27,403, compared to 5,031 in Big bear lake.
  • The median age in Big bear lake is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 30.3 years in Williamsport.
  • Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020, compared to $48,388 in Williamsport.
  • In Big bear lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 24.0% in Williamsport.
  • Williamsport has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Williamsport.

Demographics

Demographics Williamsport vs Big bear lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Williamsport Big bear lake
Black 14 Data is updating
White 75 50
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 3 30
Two or More Races 6 16
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Williamsport vs Big bear lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Williamsport at 14% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
  • Williamsport has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
  • In Big bear lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Williamsport.
  • Big bear lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Williamsport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big bear lake at 16%, compared to 6% in Williamsport.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Williamsport and Big bear lake at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Williamsport Big bear lake
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 12.1%
Depression 24.6% 20.5%
Smoking 22.7% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 17.0%
Obesity 40.4% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Williamsport vs Big bear lake

  • More residents in Williamsport report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Big bear lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Williamsport at 24.6% compared to 20.5% in Big bear lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Williamsport at 22.7% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Big bear lake at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Williamsport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Williamsport at 40.4% compared to 37.0% in Big bear lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Williamsport at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Williamsport Big bear lake
No Schooling 0.7% (186) 0.7% (37)
High School Diploma 16.4% (4,487) 16.4% (825)
Less than High School 12.8% (3,507) 12.6% (634)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.1% (4,416) 25.7% (1,294)

Education Levels Comparison: Williamsport vs Big bear lake

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Williamsport and Big bear lake at 0.7%.
  • Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 16.4%.
  • More residents in Williamsport have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
  • In Big bear lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 16.1% in Williamsport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.