Demographics details for Williamsburg, KY vs Upper darby, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Williamsburg, KY vs Upper darby, PA.

Data Williamsburg Upper darby
Population 5,163 85,217
Median Age 27.3 years 35.7 years
Median Income $33,875 $67,579
Married Families 29.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 19% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Williamsburg vs Upper darby

  • The population in Upper darby is higher at 85,217, compared to 5,163 in Williamsburg.
  • The median age in Upper darby is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 27.3 years in Williamsburg.
  • Upper darby has a higher median income of $67,579, compared to $33,875 in Williamsburg.
  • In Upper darby, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 29.0% in Williamsburg.
  • Williamsburg has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 9% in Upper darby.
  • Upper darby has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Williamsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Williamsburg vs Upper darby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Williamsburg Upper darby
Black 4 34
White 90 39
Asian 1 12
Hispanic 3 9
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 4% in Williamsburg.
  • Williamsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 39% in Upper darby.
  • In Upper darby, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Williamsburg.
  • Upper darby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Williamsburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Upper darby at 6%, compared to 2% in Williamsburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Williamsburg and Upper darby at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Williamsburg Upper darby
Mental Health Not Good 21.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 16.6% Data is updating%
Depression 32.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 26.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 42.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Upper darby

  • More residents in Williamsburg report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Williamsburg at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Williamsburg at 42.9% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Williamsburg at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Upper darby.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Williamsburg Upper darby
No Schooling 0.2% (11) 1.4% (1,162)
High School Diploma 12.5% (647) 17.6% (14,973)
Less than High School 24.8% (1,280) 10.3% (8,806)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.3% (633) 22.2% (18,927)

Education Levels Comparison: Williamsburg vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Williamsburg.
  • In Upper darby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Williamsburg.
  • More residents in Williamsburg have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 10.3% in Upper darby.
  • In Upper darby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 12.3% in Williamsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.