Demographics details for Williamsburg, KY vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Williamsburg, KY vs Monroe, MI.
| Data | Williamsburg | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,163 | 20,295 |
| Median Age | 27.3 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $33,875 | $57,779 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Williamsburg vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 20,295, compared to 5,163 in Williamsburg.
- The median age in Monroe is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 27.3 years in Williamsburg.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $57,779, compared to $33,875 in Williamsburg.
- In Monroe, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 29.0% in Williamsburg.
- Williamsburg has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 12% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Williamsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Williamsburg vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Williamsburg | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | 90 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Williamsburg.
- Williamsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- Both Williamsburg and Monroe have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Williamsburg and Monroe at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Monroe at 4%, compared to 2% in Williamsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Williamsburg and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Williamsburg | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 32.0% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 42.9% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Monroe
- More residents in Williamsburg report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 19.4% in Monroe.
- Depression is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 32.0% compared to 25.7% in Monroe.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 26.4% compared to 21.6% in Monroe.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe at 17.5% compared to 14.1% in Williamsburg.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 42.9% in Williamsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Williamsburg at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Williamsburg | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 0.5% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (647) | 17.0% (3,449) |
| Less than High School | 24.8% (1,280) | 13.0% (2,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (633) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Williamsburg vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Williamsburg.
- In Monroe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in Williamsburg.
- More residents in Williamsburg have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 12.3% in Williamsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.