Demographics details for Williamsburg, KY vs Firth, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Williamsburg, KY vs Firth, NE.
Data | Williamsburg | Firth |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,163 | 654 |
Median Age | 27.3 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $33,875 | $86,042 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 19% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Williamsburg vs Firth
- In Williamsburg, the population is higher at 5,163, compared to 654 in Firth.
- The median age in Firth is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 27.3 years in Williamsburg.
- Firth has a higher median income of $86,042, compared to $33,875 in Williamsburg.
- In Firth, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Williamsburg.
- Williamsburg has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 5% in Firth.
- The unemployment rate in Williamsburg is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Firth.
Demographics
Demographics Williamsburg vs Firth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Williamsburg | Firth |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 90 | 85 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Firth
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Williamsburg at 4% compared to 0% in Firth.
- Williamsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 85% in Firth.
- Both Williamsburg and Firth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Firth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Williamsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Firth at 6%, compared to 2% in Williamsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Williamsburg and Firth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Williamsburg | Firth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 12.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 7.0% |
Depression | 32.0% | 17.9% |
Smoking | 26.4% | 11.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 24.1% |
Obesity | 42.9% | 31.5% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Williamsburg vs Firth
- More residents in Williamsburg report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 12.3% in Firth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 32.0% compared to 17.9% in Firth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Williamsburg at 26.4% compared to 11.4% in Firth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Firth at 24.1% compared to 14.1% in Williamsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Williamsburg at 42.9% compared to 31.5% in Firth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Williamsburg at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in Firth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Williamsburg | Firth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 3.2% (21) |
High School Diploma | 12.5% (647) | 9.2% (60) |
Less than High School | 24.8% (1,280) | 10.1% (66) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (633) | 12.5% (82) |
Education Levels Comparison: Williamsburg vs Firth
- In Firth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.2% in Williamsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Williamsburg hold a high school diploma at 12.5% compared to 9.2% in Firth.
- More residents in Williamsburg have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 10.1% in Firth.
- In Firth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.3% in Williamsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.