Demographics details for Wilkinson, IN vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wilkinson, IN vs South gate, CA.
| Data | Wilkinson | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 408 | 90,926 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $61,146 | $67,188 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Wilkinson vs South gate
- The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 408 in Wilkinson.
- The median age in South gate is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 33.5 years in Wilkinson.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188, compared to $61,146 in Wilkinson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wilkinson at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 7% in Wilkinson.
- South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Wilkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Wilkinson vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wilkinson | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | -21 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 97 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wilkinson vs South gate
- In South gate, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Wilkinson.
- Wilkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In South gate, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Wilkinson.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 1% in Wilkinson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 3% in Wilkinson.
- In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Wilkinson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wilkinson | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wilkinson vs South gate
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Wilkinson and South gate at 16.8%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wilkinson at 26.6% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wilkinson at 19.0% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wilkinson at 16.8% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 34.1%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wilkinson at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wilkinson | South gate |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.6% (4,160) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (124) | 14.9% (13,536) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (36) | 53.3% (48,481) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (36) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wilkinson vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.0% in Wilkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wilkinson hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 8.8% in Wilkinson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wilkinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.