Demographics details for Wickliffe, OH vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wickliffe, OH vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Wickliffe | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,610 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 43.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $76,938 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Wickliffe vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 12,610 in Wickliffe.
- Residents in Wickliffe have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Wickliffe has a higher median income of $76,938 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wickliffe at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- The unemployment rate in Wickliffe is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Wickliffe vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Wickliffe | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 7 |
White | 85 | 71 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wickliffe vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Wickliffe.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Wickliffe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wickliffe and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Wickliffe | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.3% |
Depression | 22.3% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wickliffe vs Loves park
- More residents in Wickliffe report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wickliffe at 22.3% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wickliffe at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wickliffe at 19.4% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 36.7% in Wickliffe.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Wickliffe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Wickliffe | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (32) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,877) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (1,049) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.5% (2,331) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wickliffe vs Loves park
- In Loves park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Wickliffe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wickliffe hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 8.3% in Wickliffe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wickliffe hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.