Demographics details for Wichita, KS vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wichita, KS vs Indian trail, NC.
| Data | Wichita | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 396,192 | 41,724 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,712 | $95,101 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Wichita vs Indian trail
- In Wichita, the population is higher at 396,192, compared to 41,724 in Indian trail.
- The median age in Indian trail is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Wichita.
- Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $60,712 in Wichita.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Wichita.
- Wichita has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in Wichita is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics Wichita vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wichita | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 9 |
| White | 56 | 71 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wichita vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wichita at 10% compared to 9% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 56% in Wichita.
- The Asian population is larger in Wichita at 5% compared to 3% in Indian trail.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita at 18% compared to 11% in Indian trail.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita at 10% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita at 1% compared to 0% in Indian trail.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wichita | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita vs Indian trail
- More residents in Wichita report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Indian trail at 22.0% versus 21.2% in Wichita.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wichita at 20.0% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Wichita.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wichita at 40.4% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wichita at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wichita | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (6,509) | 0.7% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (53,581) | 12.8% (5,353) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (54,534) | 6.6% (2,761) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (80,251) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wichita vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
- More residents in Wichita have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 20.3% in Wichita.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.