Demographics details for Wichita, KS vs Fort washington, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wichita, KS vs Fort washington, MD.
| Data | Wichita | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 396,192 | 25,825 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,712 | $143,623 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Wichita vs Fort washington
- In Wichita, the population is higher at 396,192, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
- The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Wichita.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $60,712 in Wichita.
- In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Wichita.
- Wichita has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- The unemployment rate in Wichita is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.
Demographics
Demographics Wichita vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wichita | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 61 |
| White | 56 | 8 |
| Asian | 5 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wichita vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 10% in Wichita.
- Wichita has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 5% in Wichita.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita at 18% compared to 17% in Fort washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita at 10% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita at 1% compared to 0% in Fort washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wichita | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 11.6% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 12.0% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita vs Fort washington
- More residents in Wichita report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wichita at 21.2% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wichita at 20.0% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wichita at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wichita at 40.4% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wichita at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wichita | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (6,509) | 1.2% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (53,581) | 14.4% (3,710) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (54,534) | 8.3% (2,138) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (80,251) | 31.8% (8,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wichita vs Fort washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 13.5% in Wichita.
- More residents in Wichita have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 20.3% in Wichita.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.