Demographics details for Wichita, KS vs Fairfield, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wichita, KS vs Fairfield, CT.
| Data | Wichita | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 396,192 | 62,105 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,712 | $102,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | Data is updating |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Wichita vs Fairfield
- In Wichita, the population is higher at 396,192, compared to 62,105 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.4 years in Wichita.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000, compared to $60,712 in Wichita.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wichita at 36.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Wichita has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The unemployment rate in Wichita is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Wichita vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wichita | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 5 |
| White | 56 | 80 |
| Asian | 5 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wichita vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wichita at 10% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 80% compared to 56% in Wichita.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 5% in Wichita.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita at 18% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita at 10% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wichita | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita vs Fairfield
- More residents in Wichita report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wichita at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wichita at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wichita at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wichita at 40.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wichita at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wichita | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (6,509) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (53,581) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (54,534) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (80,251) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wichita vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Wichita have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.