Demographics details for Wichita, KS vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wichita, KS vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | Wichita | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 396,192 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $60,712 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Wichita vs Clarksdale
- In Wichita, the population is higher at 396,192, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age is the same in both Wichita and Clarksdale at 35.4 years.
- Wichita has a higher median income of $60,712 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Wichita at 36.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 13% in Wichita.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 4.1% in Wichita.
Demographics
Demographics Wichita vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wichita | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 86 |
| White | 56 | 9 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wichita vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 10% in Wichita.
- Wichita has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- The Asian population is larger in Wichita at 5% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita at 18% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita at 10% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita at 1% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wichita | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Wichita.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wichita at 21.2% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 20.0% in Wichita.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wichita at 16.6% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 40.4% in Wichita.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Wichita.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wichita | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (6,509) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (53,581) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (54,534) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (80,251) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wichita vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.6% in Wichita.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 13.8% in Wichita.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.