Demographics details for Wichita falls, TX vs Water valley, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wichita falls, TX vs Water valley, MS.

Data Wichita falls Water valley
Population 102,664 3,361
Median Age 32.8 years 35.8 years
Median Income $55,584 $45,718
Married Families 34.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 14% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.9 4.3

Population Comparison: Wichita falls vs Water valley

  • In Wichita falls, the population is higher at 102,664, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in Water valley is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher median income of $55,584 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Wichita falls at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • Wichita falls has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Wichita falls is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.3% in Water valley.

Demographics

Demographics Wichita falls vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wichita falls Water valley
Black 12 49
White 54 49
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 2
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 12% in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wichita falls at 3% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita falls at 22% compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita falls at 8% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita falls at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wichita falls Water valley
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 13.8%
Depression 24.6% 22.0%
Smoking 18.6% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 12.9%
Obesity 37.1% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Water valley

  • More residents in Wichita falls report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Wichita falls at 24.6% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 37.1% in Wichita falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wichita falls Water valley
No Schooling 1.0% (1,035) 1.0% (34)
High School Diploma 15.1% (15,510) 24.0% (805)
Less than High School 14.6% (14,970) 13.0% (437)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.1% (15,550) 9.6% (322)

Education Levels Comparison: Wichita falls vs Water valley

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Wichita falls and Water valley at 1.0%.
  • In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
  • More residents in Wichita falls have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.