Demographics details for Wichita falls, TX vs Springfield, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wichita falls, TX vs Springfield, OR.

Data Wichita falls Springfield
Population 102,664 61,400
Median Age 32.8 years 37.3 years
Median Income $55,584 $60,982
Married Families 34.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 4.1

Population Comparison: Wichita falls vs Springfield

  • In Wichita falls, the population is higher at 102,664, compared to 61,400 in Springfield.
  • The median age in Springfield is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Springfield has a higher median income of $60,982, compared to $55,584 in Wichita falls.
  • In Springfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Springfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Wichita falls is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.1% in Springfield.

Demographics

Demographics Wichita falls vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wichita falls Springfield
Black 12 1
White 54 73
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 22 14
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Springfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wichita falls at 12% compared to 1% in Springfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Springfield at 73% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wichita falls at 3% compared to 2% in Springfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita falls at 22% compared to 14% in Springfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 9%, compared to 8% in Wichita falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wichita falls and Springfield at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wichita falls Springfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 13.3%
Depression 24.6% 28.9%
Smoking 18.6% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 16.9%
Obesity 37.1% 36.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.3% in Wichita falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 28.9% versus 24.6% in Wichita falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wichita falls at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Springfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 16.9% in Springfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wichita falls at 37.1% compared to 36.4% in Springfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wichita falls Springfield
No Schooling 1.0% (1,035) 0.9% (528)
High School Diploma 15.1% (15,510) 14.9% (9,128)
Less than High School 14.6% (14,970) 14.4% (8,821)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.1% (15,550) 14.2% (8,749)

Education Levels Comparison: Wichita falls vs Springfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Springfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 14.9% in Springfield.
  • More residents in Wichita falls have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 14.4% in Springfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Springfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.