Environment details: Wichita falls TX
Average quality; treatment facilities require focus.
Environment details: Logsden OR
Water quality good; generally clean resources.
Compare Environment: Wichita falls TX vs Logsden OR
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Wichita falls | Logsden |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 5308 | 308 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Average quality; treatment facilities require focus. | Water quality good; generally clean resources. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.73 | 1.57 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 32 | 8 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Wichita falls vs Logsden
- The water quality in Logsden is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Wichita falls.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Wichita falls with 1.73 compared to 1.57 in Logsden.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Wichita falls at 32 compared to 8 in Logsden.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.