Demographics details for Wichita falls, TX vs Burnham, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wichita falls, TX vs Burnham, PA.
| Data | Wichita falls | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 102,664 | 1,972 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,584 | $58,929 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Wichita falls vs Burnham
- In Wichita falls, the population is higher at 102,664, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- The median age in Burnham is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
- Burnham has a higher median income of $58,929, compared to $55,584 in Wichita falls.
- In Burnham, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Wichita falls and Burnham at 14%.
- Burnham has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.9% in Wichita falls.
Demographics
Demographics Wichita falls vs Burnham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wichita falls | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 3 |
| White | 54 | 94 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 22 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wichita falls at 12% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burnham at 94% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Wichita falls at 3% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita falls at 22% compared to 0% in Burnham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita falls at 8% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita falls at 1% compared to 0% in Burnham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wichita falls | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Burnham
- More residents in Wichita falls report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Burnham.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.6%.
- Burnham has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 18.3% in Burnham.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wichita falls at 37.1% compared to 35.5% in Burnham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wichita falls at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wichita falls | Burnham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (1,035) | 0.3% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (15,510) | 27.1% (535) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (14,970) | 4.1% (80) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.1% (15,550) | 7.5% (147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wichita falls vs Burnham
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- In Burnham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
- More residents in Wichita falls have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.