Demographics details for Whittier, CA vs Smith center, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Whittier, CA vs Smith center, KS.

Data Whittier Smith center
Population 84,496 1,561
Median Age 37.8 years 46.6 years
Median Income $89,686 $49,444
Married Families 37.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 3.2

Population Comparison: Whittier vs Smith center

  • In Whittier, the population is higher at 84,496, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
  • The median age in Smith center is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Whittier.
  • Whittier has a higher median income of $89,686 compared to $49,444 in Smith center.
  • In Smith center, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Whittier.
  • Whittier has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Smith center.
  • The unemployment rate in Whittier is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.2% in Smith center.

Demographics

Demographics Whittier vs Smith center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Whittier Smith center
Black 1 1
White 9 94
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 69 3
Two or More Races 14 2
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Whittier vs Smith center

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Whittier and Smith center at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Smith center at 94% compared to 9% in Whittier.
  • The Asian population is larger in Whittier at 5% compared to 0% in Smith center.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Whittier at 69% compared to 3% in Smith center.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Whittier at 14% compared to 2% in Smith center.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Whittier at 2% compared to 0% in Smith center.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Whittier Smith center
Mental Health Not Good 14.7% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 10.8%
Depression 15.8% 21.7%
Smoking 9.5% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 19.0%
Obesity 29.3% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Whittier vs Smith center

  • In Smith center, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.7% in Whittier.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Smith center at 21.7% versus 15.8% in Whittier.
  • Smith center has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 9.5% in Whittier.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Smith center at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in Whittier.
  • Smith center has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 29.3% in Whittier.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Smith center at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Whittier.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Whittier Smith center
No Schooling 1.7% (1,446) 0.2% (3)
High School Diploma 18.2% (15,370) 29.4% (459)
Less than High School 15.3% (12,929) 7.6% (118)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (16,519) 14.8% (231)

Education Levels Comparison: Whittier vs Smith center

  • A higher percentage of residents in Whittier have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
  • In Smith center, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.4% compared to 18.2% in Whittier.
  • More residents in Whittier have less than a high school education at 15.3% compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Whittier hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in Smith center.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.