Demographics details for Whiteville, NC vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whiteville, NC vs Hoover, AL.
Data | Whiteville | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,394 | 92,435 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $42,000 | $101,765 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Whiteville vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 5,394 in Whiteville.
- The median age in Hoover is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 38.0 years in Whiteville.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765, compared to $42,000 in Whiteville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whiteville at 56.0% compared to 46.0% in Hoover.
- Whiteville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in Hoover.
- The unemployment rate in Whiteville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Whiteville vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Whiteville | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 20 |
White | 60 | 67 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whiteville vs Hoover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whiteville at 30% compared to 20% in Hoover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hoover at 67% compared to 60% in Whiteville.
- Both Whiteville and Hoover have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Whiteville and Hoover at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hoover at 3%, compared to 0% in Whiteville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whiteville and Hoover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Whiteville | Hoover |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.6% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 21.3% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 32.1% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whiteville vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 0.0% in Whiteville.
- Hoover has a higher smoking rate at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- Hoover has higher obesity rates at 32.1% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hoover at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Whiteville | Hoover |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (583) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.3% (6,787) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.8% (3,478) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whiteville vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- In Hoover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hoover at 3.8%, compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.