Demographics details for Whiteville, NC vs Chickasha, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Whiteville, NC vs Chickasha, OK.

Data Whiteville Chickasha
Population 5,394 16,549
Median Age 38.0 years 36.4 years
Median Income $42,000 $55,136
Married Families 56.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 20% 17%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Whiteville vs Chickasha

  • The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 5,394 in Whiteville.
  • Residents in Whiteville have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $42,000 in Whiteville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Whiteville at 56.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
  • Whiteville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 17% in Chickasha.
  • The unemployment rate in Whiteville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.

Demographics

Demographics Whiteville vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Whiteville Chickasha
Black 30 6
White 60 71
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Whiteville vs Chickasha

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whiteville at 30% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 60% in Whiteville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Whiteville at 5% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
  • Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Whiteville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 0% in Whiteville.
  • In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Whiteville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Whiteville Chickasha
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.7%
Depression Data is updating% 25.4%
Smoking Data is updating% 21.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Whiteville vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Whiteville Chickasha
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (78)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 22.5% (3,730)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.1% (2,160)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.5% (2,066)

Education Levels Comparison: Whiteville vs Chickasha

  • In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.
  • In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Whiteville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.