Demographics details for Whitehall, WI vs Hazelton, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, WI vs Hazelton, ID.
Data | Whitehall | Hazelton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,632 | 814 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $56,894 | $44,468 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Hazelton
- In Whitehall, the population is higher at 1,632, compared to 814 in Hazelton.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 36.3 years in Hazelton.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $56,894 compared to $44,468 in Hazelton.
- In Hazelton, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazelton at 15%, compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Hazelton.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Hazelton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Whitehall | Hazelton |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 83 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 73 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 29 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Hazelton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whitehall at 1% compared to 0% in Hazelton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazelton at 85% compared to 83% in Whitehall.
- Both Whitehall and Hazelton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hazelton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 12% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazelton at 29%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Whitehall at 1% compared to 0% in Hazelton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Whitehall | Hazelton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.0% |
Depression | 24.0% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 24.4% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Hazelton
- In Hazelton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 24.0% compared to 22.8% in Hazelton.
- Hazelton has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 14.9% in Hazelton.
- Hazelton has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Hazelton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Whitehall | Hazelton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (7) | 0.5% (4) |
High School Diploma | 24.4% (398) | 18.2% (148) |
Less than High School | 15.7% (256) | 72.0% (586) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (141) | 6.0% (49) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Hazelton
- In Hazelton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 18.2% in Hazelton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazelton at 72.0%, compared to 15.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 6.0% in Hazelton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.