Demographics details for Whitehall, WI vs Edna, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, WI vs Edna, TX.
| Data | Whitehall | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,632 | 6,009 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,894 | $60,361 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Edna
- The population in Edna is higher at 6,009, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- The median age in Edna is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Edna has a higher median income of $60,361, compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- In Edna, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Edna.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.2% in Edna.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Edna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 83 | 41 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Edna
- In Edna, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 41% in Edna.
- Both Whitehall and Edna have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Edna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 12% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Edna at 9%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Whitehall at 1% compared to 0% in Edna.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.4% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Edna
- In Edna, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 24.0% compared to 22.8% in Edna.
- Edna has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 17.9% in Edna.
- Edna has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Whitehall and Edna at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Edna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (7) | 3.0% (182) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (398) | 19.7% (1,186) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (256) | 28.2% (1,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (141) | 8.4% (504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Edna
- In Edna, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 19.7% in Edna.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edna at 28.2%, compared to 15.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 8.4% in Edna.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.