Demographics details for Whitehall, WI vs Douglas, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, WI vs Douglas, GA.
| Data | Whitehall | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,632 | 11,685 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,894 | $39,716 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Douglas
- The population in Douglas is higher at 11,685, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 30.7 years in Douglas.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $56,894 compared to $39,716 in Douglas.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 30.0% compared to 25.0% in Douglas.
- The poverty level is higher in Douglas at 20%, compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 52 |
| White | 83 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Douglas
- In Douglas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 33% in Douglas.
- Both Whitehall and Douglas have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Whitehall at 12% compared to 11% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Douglas at 4%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Whitehall at 1% compared to 0% in Douglas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.4% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 44.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Douglas
- In Douglas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 12.9% in Douglas.
- Douglas has higher obesity rates at 44.8% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Douglas at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (7) | 1.1% (125) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (398) | 18.0% (2,098) |
| Less than High School | 15.7% (256) | 18.9% (2,206) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (141) | 8.9% (1,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Douglas
- In Douglas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 18.0% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 18.9%, compared to 15.7% in Whitehall.
- In Douglas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.9% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.