Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Tuscaloosa, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Tuscaloosa, AL.
| Data | Whitehall | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 110,602 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $47,257 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Tuscaloosa
- The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 14,785 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 45.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 8% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 41 |
| White | 78 | 49 |
| Asian | 14 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 4% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- Both Whitehall and Tuscaloosa have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Tuscaloosa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Tuscaloosa
- In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 22.0% compared to 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
- Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Tuscaloosa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 0.7% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 12.5% (13,878) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 6.1% (6,781) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 20.3% (22,425) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Tuscaloosa
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
- More residents in Whitehall have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 6.1% in Tuscaloosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 20.3% in Tuscaloosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.