Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Stanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Stanton, CA.
| Data | Whitehall | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 38,952 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $76,123 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Stanton
- The population in Stanton is higher at 38,952, compared to 14,785 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Stanton.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $76,123 in Stanton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Stanton.
- Whitehall has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Stanton.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.3% in Stanton.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Stanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 78 | 8 |
| Asian | 14 | 26 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Stanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whitehall at 4% compared to 2% in Stanton.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 8% in Stanton.
- In Stanton, the Asian population stands at 26%, greater than 14% in Whitehall.
- Stanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanton at 11%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- In Stanton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Whitehall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 13.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 22.0% compared to 17.0% in Stanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Whitehall at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Stanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Whitehall at 21.4% compared to 14.3% in Stanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Whitehall at 30.9% compared to 28.4% in Stanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Stanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 3.9% (1,532) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 15.2% (5,904) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 31.4% (12,250) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 14.1% (5,475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 2.0% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Stanton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanton at 31.4%, compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 14.1% in Stanton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.