Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Quimby, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Quimby, IA.
| Data | Whitehall | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 244 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $57,500 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Quimby
- In Whitehall, the population is higher at 14,785, compared to 244 in Quimby.
- The median age in Quimby is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 44.8 years in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $57,500 in Quimby.
- In Quimby, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 45.0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Quimby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 76 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Quimby
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whitehall at 4% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 76% in Quimby.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- Quimby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Whitehall at 3% compared to 0% in Quimby.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Quimby at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Quimby
- In Quimby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 22.0% compared to 18.9% in Quimby.
- Quimby has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Quimby at 21.7% compared to 21.4% in Whitehall.
- Quimby has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Quimby at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Quimby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 41.8% (102) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 30.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 9.8% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Quimby
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
- In Quimby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.8% compared to 18.2% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Quimby at 30.3%, compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 9.8% in Quimby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.