Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Grafton, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Grafton, WI.
| Data | Whitehall | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 12,433 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 43.8 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $83,500 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Grafton
- In Whitehall, the population is higher at 14,785, compared to 12,433 in Grafton.
- Residents in Whitehall have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 43.8 years in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher median income of $83,500, compared to $77,752 in Whitehall.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Whitehall and Grafton at 45.0%.
- Whitehall has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 4% in Grafton.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Grafton.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Grafton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 78 | 87 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whitehall at 4% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grafton at 87% compared to 78% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 2% in Grafton.
- Grafton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grafton at 5%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Grafton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 11.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 25.5% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Grafton
- More residents in Whitehall report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Grafton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Grafton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Whitehall at 17.0% compared to 11.6% in Grafton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grafton at 25.5% compared to 21.4% in Whitehall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Whitehall at 30.9% compared to 28.5% in Grafton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Grafton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Grafton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 12.9% (1,600) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 3.1% (384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 31.8% (3,959) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Grafton
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Grafton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 12.9% in Grafton.
- More residents in Whitehall have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 3.1% in Grafton.
- In Grafton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 31.1% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.