Demographics details for Whitehall, PA vs Corwith, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Whitehall, PA vs Corwith, IA.
| Data | Whitehall | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,785 | 265 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 48.9 years |
| Median Income | $77,752 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Whitehall vs Corwith
- In Whitehall, the population is higher at 14,785, compared to 265 in Corwith.
- The median age in Corwith is higher at 48.9 years, compared to 44.8 years in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher median income of $77,752 compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Whitehall at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Corwith.
- Whitehall has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- The unemployment rate in Whitehall is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.3% in Corwith.
Demographics
Demographics Whitehall vs Corwith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Whitehall | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 94 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Whitehall vs Corwith
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Whitehall at 4% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Corwith at 94% compared to 78% in Whitehall.
- The Asian population is larger in Whitehall at 14% compared to 0% in Corwith.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Whitehall and Corwith at 1%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corwith at 5%, compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Whitehall and Corwith at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Whitehall | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 22.1% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Whitehall vs Corwith
- In Corwith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.5% in Whitehall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Whitehall at 22.0% compared to 18.7% in Corwith.
- Corwith has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 21.4% in Whitehall.
- Corwith has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 30.9% in Whitehall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Whitehall | Corwith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (302) | 2.6% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (2,688) | 26.8% (71) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (1,141) | 22.3% (59) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (4,603) | 7.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Whitehall vs Corwith
- In Corwith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.0% in Whitehall.
- In Corwith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.8% compared to 18.2% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corwith at 22.3%, compared to 7.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Whitehall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.