Environment details: White swan WA
Water quality is good; protected source contributes.
Environment details: North mankato MN
Moderate quality; monitor variation.
Compare Environment: White swan WA vs North mankato MN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | White swan | North mankato |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 590 | 665 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality is good; protected source contributes. | Moderate quality; monitor variation. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.73 | 1.63 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 32 | 18 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: White swan vs North mankato
- Water quality is rated higher in White swan at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in North mankato.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in White swan with 1.73 compared to 1.63 in North mankato.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in White swan at 32 compared to 18 in North mankato.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.