Demographics details for White swan, WA vs Hazleton, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in White swan, WA vs Hazleton, PA.
Data | White swan | Hazleton |
---|---|---|
Population | 561 | 29,993 |
Median Age | 24.5 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $51,667 | $39,362 |
Married Families | 13.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 8.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: White swan vs Hazleton
- The population in Hazleton is higher at 29,993, compared to 561 in White swan.
- The median age in Hazleton is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 24.5 years in White swan.
- White swan has a higher median income of $51,667 compared to $39,362 in Hazleton.
- In Hazleton, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 13.0% in White swan.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazleton at 23%, compared to 12% in White swan.
- The unemployment rate in White swan is higher at 8.2%, compared to 4.9% in Hazleton.
Demographics
Demographics White swan vs Hazleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | White swan | Hazleton |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 7 |
White | -6 | 17 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 26 | 62 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 14 |
American Indian | 70 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: White swan vs Hazleton
- In Hazleton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in White swan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazleton at 17% compared to -6% in White swan.
- Both White swan and Hazleton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hazleton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 26% in White swan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazleton at 14%, compared to 10% in White swan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in White swan at 70% compared to 0% in Hazleton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | White swan | Hazleton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.2% |
Depression | 24.7% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 26.0% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 43.8% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: White swan vs Hazleton
- More residents in White swan report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Hazleton.
- Depression is more prevalent in White swan at 24.7% compared to 22.2% in Hazleton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in White swan at 26.0% compared to 24.2% in Hazleton.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both White swan and Hazleton at 15.8%.
- Obesity rates are higher in White swan at 43.8% compared to 40.7% in Hazleton.
- Disability percentages are higher in White swan at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Hazleton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | White swan | Hazleton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.1% (918) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (92) | 20.7% (6,219) |
Less than High School | 24.8% (139) | 35.6% (10,664) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (5) | 7.1% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: White swan vs Hazleton
- In Hazleton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in White swan.
- In Hazleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 16.4% in White swan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazleton at 35.6%, compared to 24.8% in White swan.
- In Hazleton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.1% compared to 0.9% in White swan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.